False alliances Part II
We had the opportunity to see further evidence of the battle between "Web E" and H.R.G and we will continue into part II of our report, following our previous post.
Through a recent document published by HRG (ie OEA in the Hellenic language) through the following website (source 1, source 2) it has been clear the HRG has "ordered" military forces to murder the people of "Web E" and the sites that are linked to it in the news report, on the charges of treason (!) and cooperation with masonic lodges.Our knowledge and experience of the above "warfare", limited as it may be, originated from the need of HRG to control all information flow from and to the "Web E" news report, claiming exclusive right to a free speech media. This, in logical terms, can be more accurately described as "controlled media", by an "invisible" (ie shadow) organization. The people from the media refused to comply and were sued by third persons, belonging in theosophic lodges, for texts belonging to HRG (published through "Web E"). For the record, the lawsuits included HRG, which in the end came out without a scratch, while the legal owner & producer of the "Web E" portal suffered massive losses.The above we can confirm.Allow us to look into the deeper parts, the ideology. HRG, in the past, has claimed to be a non-dogmatic defender of free speech and all the ancient virtues of civilization, as well as a defender of humanity. Now it claims to be the only one who is right about all matters and has been appearing with a very frightening and authoritive face, issuing "death warrants".Two questions:a. What type of non-dogmatic group applies its own opinion in a form of a dogma?b. If HRG appears as fear and authority producing group, aren't they trying to make sheep out of people just as religions do?And our conclusion question:A question people should ask HRG, "What is your ideological difference from the ones you're claiming to be fighting against?"These are things that will keep on in our minds. The conclusions are yours.
Imminent Danger
It has been made public that Israel has asked for the presense of NATO around its northern borders, in order to provide "security". Israeli officials claimed that they asked for that presense because the Libanese army is weak (?) and that the operations are not going as well as they anticipated. It is common knowledge that no other force has been allowed around Israel's borders.
On the other hand, Syria has threatened that if there is a ground invasion of Lebanon, they will respond accordingly, obviously by sending in their own troops. In this case, allow us to look more deeply into diplomatic relations.In the recent years, China and Russia have signed a protection pact with Damascus (Syria) and Tehran (Iran). This means that if one of those two countries is attacked, it will be considered an attack (and therefore a declaration of war) against the protectors. In this case, if Israel, with the aid of NATO, invade Lebanon and clash with Syrian armies, it will be considered an attack on Syria. This, by extension will be considered an attack against both China and Russia. This means that the two latter countries will enter war against NATO, meaning against Europe and the United States of America. One other link of the chain is the repeatedly reported Chinese originated plans (often reffered as NWO plans) to reduce the world population by 80%!We urge our readers to consider the above information.
It is rather obvious that the bloodiest world war will commence as soon as NATO troops step on Israeli ground. Are Europe and the United States ready to face Islam, Russia and China (and their allies) at the same time? Are Europe and the United States prime candidates in this 80% of the "population cleansing"?We lay down the questions for you, so that you can find your own answers.Think wisely, because if things go wrong, we probably won't get a third chance. Because we obviously failed to learn our lesson from the previous two world wars.
False alliances?
It has fallen into our attention an issue of domestic nature in the Hellenic Republic (also known as Greece). Simply because of the nature of this web site, we cannot jump to conclusions unless we have more extended information regarding this issue. Still, we can briefly state the facts and apply some questions. From there on, our readers can reach their own conclusions.The conflict includes two research teams, HRG (stands for Hellenic Restoration Group) and Web E. Allow us to illustrate the roles:HRG is an "invisible" group of people in various positions around the globe, claiming to have direct access in masonic lodges, that opposes Zion and its progennitor, China (or Sina, from the etymological correlation Sin/Sion/Sina). This group seems to be practically untouchable due to their high level of secrecy. There is only one visible member, who publicizes (or not) information of geostrategic importance, regarding Chinese plans to destroy the black and the white race.Web E is a group of people that move in the same ideological grounds and use an up to date technology to bring information to the public regarding the same issues as HRG. Several of its members are visible to the public while others are not. The difference is that for a long time, Web E was functioning also as an extensive online library, until the moment they key server equipment was illegaly confiscated (without court order) and the digital library destroyed along with its onsite files. We have recently been informed though that there are other real-time backups that will go online shortly.The above two groups, even though they share the same foundations in their ideology, have gone into conflict the past 12 months. From our prespective, the most likely issue is control related. For a long time, Web E was publishing texts from HRG, giving the group (as with every opposing opinion) the right to free speech and publicity. Several of those texts though became offensive for certain circles of theosophic masonry, the orchestrator of all religious activities, old and new age. HRG (the visible representative) obviously came out untouched and unharmed, while Web E suffered arrests and trials, not mentioning the financial and employment loss of several of its members.Recently, the representative of HRG has been using theosophic masons to offend or possibly provoke Web E.If we are allowed to input our subjective opinion, it can be really sad that a research group, a civilization beacon that represents one of the last defences of both the black and white race, to have fallen so low.We will report further information as they are released.
